Requirement sanity check
Is this requirement clear, testable, affordable and linked to the mission?
Citable answer
What this door means.
Entry
Small decision pack
Band name only. No public price.
Output
Requirement defects, rewrite, test hooks
It converts an ambiguous defence problem into a funded decision with evidence, uncertainty and next research tasks.
Related buyer questions.
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for force generation and readiness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Field Army HQ planning cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for campaign planning and force employment clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Corps/division G5/G7 staff actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for brigade combat effectiveness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Brigade headquarters ops/plans staff actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for battalion readiness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Battalion command team actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for sub-unit performance clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Company commander / squadron leader actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for small-team tactical effectiveness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Platoon commander / troop leader actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for close combat lethality clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Infantry capability cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for armoured manoeuvre and reconnaissance clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Armoured cavalry/regiment capability cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for long-range fires and targeting clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Artillery fires cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for counter-missile, counter-drone and GBAD coverage clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Ground-based air defence cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for rotary-wing readiness and mission fit clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Army aviation squadron actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for mobility, counter-mobility and survivability clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Engineers regiment actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for communications resilience clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Signals regiment / CIS cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for sensor-to-decision flow clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the ISR/reconnaissance unit actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for spectrum dominance and sensing clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the EW/SIGINT unit actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for sustainment and spares clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Logistics regiment/supply chain cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for deployed medical support clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Medical regiment/field hospital actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for training throughput and realism clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Training centre / battle school actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for trial design and instrumentation clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Range safety/testing cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for fleet availability and maintenance clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Vehicle maintenance unit actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for retention, morale and skills clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Personnel/recruiting/retention desk actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for reserve mobilisation and integration clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Reservist integration lead actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for drone adoption and tactical autonomy clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Brigade/battalion drones lead actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for counter-UAS coverage clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Counter-UAS lead actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for long-range strike integration clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Long-range fires user representative actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for uncrewed ground systems clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Ground robotics experimentation cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for load, protection and wearable technology clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Soldier systems / human factors cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for operational learning loop clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Operational lessons cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for rapid fielding of low-cost lethal systems clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Rapid lethality cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for fleet tasking and operational availability clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Fleet operations centre actually owns?