Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for counter-missile, counter-drone and GBAD coverage clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Ground-based air defence cell actually owns?
Threat growth outpaces legacy force structures and sensor coverage.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
Requirement sanity check
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
Ground-based air defence cell
GBAD planner/capability lead or adjacent programme/capability/commercial sponsor
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE decomposes counter-missile, counter-drone and gbad coverage into mission outcomes, constraints, measures of effectiveness, evidence needs and acquisition/test hooks.
First step
Requirement defect log, rewritten decision criteria, test hooks, acceptance evidence map
Sell as a requirements sanity-check before money or time is committed.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.army.mod.uk/learn-and-explore/army-of-the-future/readiness/future-soldier/
- https://www.army.mod.uk/learn-and-explore/about-the-army/formations-divisions-and-brigades/
- https://www.gov.uk/government/news/15-billion-new-funding-boost-to-transform-armed-forces-and-keep-the-uk-safe
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.