Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for combat air readiness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Combat air force element HQ actually owns?
Readiness depends on aircraft, pilots, weapons, spares, mission data and training.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
Requirement sanity check
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
Combat air force element HQ
Combat air staff officer or adjacent programme/capability/commercial sponsor
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE decomposes combat air readiness into mission outcomes, constraints, measures of effectiveness, evidence needs and acquisition/test hooks.
First step
Requirement defect log, rewritten decision criteria, test hooks, acceptance evidence map
Sell as a requirements sanity-check before money or time is committed.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.raf.mod.uk/our-organisation/overview/
- https://www.gov.uk/government/news/15-billion-new-funding-boost-to-transform-armed-forces-and-keep-the-uk-safe
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.