Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for airfield defence and base security clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Force protection squadron lead actually owns?
Air bases are vulnerable to drones, missiles, sabotage and cyber-physical attack.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
Requirement sanity check
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
Force protection squadron lead
Force protection commander using local discretionary, training, innovation, capture or sponsor-funded budget
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE decomposes airfield defence and base security into mission outcomes, constraints, measures of effectiveness, evidence needs and acquisition/test hooks.
First step
Requirement defect log, rewritten decision criteria, test hooks, acceptance evidence map
Sell as a requirements sanity-check before money or time is committed.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.raf.mod.uk/our-organisation/overview/
- https://www.gov.uk/government/news/15-billion-new-funding-boost-to-transform-armed-forces-and-keep-the-uk-safe
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.