What are the unresolved assumptions behind the NATO liaison / international programmes desk's next decision on coalition and alliance alignment?
Different allies have different capability targets, classification rules and industrial incentives.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
Unknowns register / research triage
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
NATO liaison / international programmes desk
International programme manager or adjacent programme/capability/commercial sponsor
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE builds a narrow evidence graph around coalition and alliance alignment, separates knowns from assumptions, and ranks Jade research tasks by decision impact.
First step
Assumption log, evidence status, decision impact ranking
Sell as a senior-staff decision hygiene pack.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/defence-expenditures-and-natos-5-commitment
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-industrial-strategy-2025-making-defence-an-engine-for-growth
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.