What 3–10 year roadmap should the Requirements writer / operational analyst set for requirements sanity and testability, and what early decisions would preserve optionality?
Requirements drift from mission need and become hard to test or procure.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
National capability roadmap
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
Requirements writer / operational analyst
Ministry, service HQ, alliance office, major prime executive, national armaments/capability authority
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE structures evidence and uncertainty around requirements sanity and testability into decision-ready options.
First step
Roadmap, scenario tree, investment sequencing, decision gates
Sell as national/service capability-roadmap work.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/defence-expenditures-and-natos-5-commitment
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-industrial-strategy-2025-making-defence-an-engine-for-growth
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.