What 3–10 year roadmap should the NATO liaison / international programmes desk set for coalition and alliance alignment, and what early decisions would preserve optionality?
Different allies have different capability targets, classification rules and industrial incentives.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
National capability roadmap
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
NATO liaison / international programmes desk
Ministry, service HQ, alliance office, major prime executive, national armaments/capability authority
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE structures evidence and uncertainty around coalition and alliance alignment into decision-ready options.
First step
Roadmap, scenario tree, investment sequencing, decision gates
Sell as national/service capability-roadmap work.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/defence-expenditures-and-natos-5-commitment
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-industrial-strategy-2025-making-defence-an-engine-for-growth
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.