What 3–10 year roadmap should the Defence data/AI product owner set for AI/data product adoption, and what early decisions would preserve optionality?
Data is fragmented, permissions are hard, and users lack trust in outputs.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
National capability roadmap
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
Defence data/AI product owner
Ministry, service HQ, alliance office, major prime executive, national armaments/capability authority
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE structures evidence and uncertainty around ai/data product adoption into decision-ready options.
First step
Roadmap, scenario tree, investment sequencing, decision gates
Sell as national/service capability-roadmap work.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/defence-expenditures-and-natos-5-commitment
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-industrial-strategy-2025-making-defence-an-engine-for-growth
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.