Requirement sanity check.
Is this requirement clear, testable, affordable and linked to the mission?
The public route names the decision boundary. The buyer brings the subject and clock.
This route usually becomes Bid Evidence Pack.
It turns a broad defence problem into a named decision with a visible evidence boundary, open questions and a clear next action.
The language a buyer may arrive with.
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for force generation and readiness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Field Army HQ planning cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for campaign planning and force employment clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Corps/division G5/G7 staff actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for brigade combat effectiveness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Brigade headquarters ops/plans staff actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for battalion readiness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Battalion command team actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for sub-unit performance clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Company commander / squadron leader actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for small-team tactical effectiveness clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Platoon commander / troop leader actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for close combat lethality clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Infantry capability cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for armoured manoeuvre and reconnaissance clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Armoured cavalry/regiment capability cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for long-range fires and targeting clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Artillery fires cell actually owns?
- Is the current requirement, CONOPS or plan for counter-missile, counter-drone and GBAD coverage clear, testable, affordable and tied to the mission the Ground-based air defence cell actually owns?
Turn the route into one commissionable Evidence Pack.
Decision owner
Single Service · Joint / Specialist · Special Operations.
Named subject
Programme, supplier, partner, target, route, account, facility, capability or budget line.
Decision clock
Bid gate, review, board paper, audit, investment committee, award notice or failure window.
Evidence Pack
Public proof first, then a private scoping note before commitment.
Bring the defence decision this route blocks.
Paste the question. Name the subject. Tell us what the answer changes. We will tell you whether it can be settled, to what grade, and as which Evidence Pack before any commitment.