How should the NATO liaison / international programmes desk decompose coalition and alliance alignment into doctrine, organisation, training, materiel, data, people, facilities and sustainment choices?
Different allies have different capability targets, classification rules and industrial incentives.
Answer block
What the page can settle.
Door
Capability decomposition
Mapped to the Bid Evidence Pack route.
Buyer
NATO liaison / international programmes desk
International programme manager or adjacent programme/capability/commercial sponsor
Fit
How Lansary reads it.
DEE decomposes coalition and alliance alignment into mission outcomes, constraints, measures of effectiveness, evidence needs and acquisition/test hooks.
First step
DOTMLPF-style capability tree, dependencies, priority gaps
Sell as a capability decomposition sprint.
Start with named public records.
- https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/defence-expenditures-and-natos-5-commitment
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-industrial-strategy-2025-making-defence-an-engine-for-growth
This page is a routing surface. The private Evidence Pack tests the named subject, dates, source boundary and decision consequence.